|
Glass/Wilson's "Monsters of Grace" heralds new perspectives in performance at Mass MoCA, 7/17/99 by Seth Rogovoy
(NORTH ADAMS, Mass., July 18, 1999) - Among the more obvious questions
raised by "Monsters of Grace," performed at the Massachusetts Museum of
Contemporary Art on Saturday night, was what was it? A film with live music?
A concert with atmospheric film footage? A high-tech, highbrow music video?
A new kind of museum experience, as the designer suggests, or the shape of
"21st-century theater" to come, as the producer claims? Or, "a digital opera
in three dimensions," as the program had it?
Questions of genre aside, "Monsters of Grace," with music by Philip Glass,
visual design by Robert Wilson, and animation by Mass MoCA's own
Kleiser-Walczak Construction Co., was a provocative, multi-media
performance -- state-of-the-art in both form and content and richly
suggestive in posing questions about how art is or should be perceived.
One of the first lines sung -- in a libretto that was apparently loosely
adapted from the ecstatic love poetry of the 13th century Persian mystic
Jalaluddin Rumi and performed in English translation -- was, "We have fallen
into a place where everything is music."
As much as anything, this line offered a key for how to approach the total,
75-minute, multi-sensory experience that was "Monsters of Grace." It
suggested that viewers, who were provided with an updated version of the
cardboard tinted glasses from 1950s 3-D horror films, immediately dispense
with any expectations of coherent narrative in the three-dimensional imagery
projected in 70 mm. film, or in the literal concerns of the inspirational
lyrics, which contained such epigrams as, "Don't go back to sleep," "You
must ask for what you really want," and, one especially appropriate for
these climes (if not for this season), "My worst habit is I get so tired of
winter….I become a torture to those I'm with."
Rather, it said, listen to Glass's music, for his compositional strategy
functioned as a kind of grammar of interpretation. Glass's dynamic score -
performed live by the ensemble that bears his name, although the composer
himself was not in attendance - relied on shifting perspective for its
dynamism. In general, Glass composes in the musical equivalent of
three-dimensional imagery. His works are powered by the contrast between
repetitive background figures and shifting foregrounds, so that subtle
changes in melody, such as they are, emerge into and out of "view."
In his "Monsters" score, Glass achieved these effects in his typical manner,
through "minimalist" shifts in rhythmic figures and melodic ostinatos, but
also via
the particular tonal qualities which gave this opera its unique character.
In keeping with the Eastern theme of Rumi's source material, Glass sampled a
variety of ancient instruments -- including the santur, the tar, and the
oud - and thus his shifting palette included an ancient vs. modern dynamic
when these samples merged with or emerged from the more modern-sounding
flutes, woodwinds and keyboard synthesizers.
These rhythmic and tonal juxtapositions had their visual correspondences
when helicopters flew over a pagoda-laced Himalayan landscape, or when a
three-dimensional cube - a reference to the monolith from "2001"? - appeared
in a desert of Biblical proportion, or when a contemporary, suburban house
floated past a Rousseau-like jungle and then a range of icebergs, only to be
swallowed whole by a mythical sea creature.
Wilson's surrealistic or dreamlike images also gained resonance through
their iconographic associations. Scenes were strewn with Biblical, religious
and mythical references, some filtered through previous works of art, such
as a God-like hand out of Michelangelo, others of a more original cast, such
as a snake coiled around an Asian table setting. Several of the scenes
suggested characters unmoored, adrift, literally "at sea" - their
disjunction from their environment in a sense mirroring the viewer's
temporary sense of dislocation.
It wasn't just the objective content of the imagery that provided these
contrasts or sense of dislocation, but also their design, arrangement and
execution. For one, there were the very Wilsonian touches, in which -- in
stark contrast to contemporary video's hypercharged action sequences --
movement occurred mostly in slow motion. (Not, however, always as slow as
one expected or even hoped for - call me an aesthetic masochist, but I
wanted to squirm a bit more, sensing that the moving images would have had
greater emotional impact had they been even more glacially timed).
There were other visual devices borrowed from photography, such as depth of
field and harrowing close-ups, that underlined the theme of shifting
perspectives, particularly in reference to foreground and background. Most
obviously, the three-dimensional effects provoked a hyper-realized sense of
space as objects seemingly hovered over the audience, a human finger
stretching out from the screen and touching the person in front of me, all
the way back in the last few rows of the theater where we were seated.
Robert Wilson has been quoted as saying, "Basically what I'm doing is
creating time and space," and indeed, with such devices at hand as Glass's
repetitive, hypnotic phrases that punctuate time and Kleiser-Walczak's
plane-busting visuals that violate the laws of physics, Wilson succeeds at
just that. He has also said, "You go to our opera like you go to a
museum….Look at the music. Listen to the pictures." This was indeed the
effect the show had, suggesting that it might ultimately prove as
influential on the way museumgoers experience art as it might be on live
performance.
It remains to be seen if "Monsters of Grace" truly heralds a new era in
theater or opera, one in which digital technology and Kleiser-Walczak's
patented "synthespians" will usurp the role of live actors. Neither is that
the intention or the point. What is doubtless happening is what has always
happened -- artists of great talent and vision are experimenting at the
edges of human thought and perception, building upon what has come before
and using the latest tools at hand to ask the same, age-old questions that
probe deep into the essence of the human condition.
In this case, it just happened to be created and exhibited right here at
Mass MoCA, and probably served as an ideal representation for what that new
cultural factory is all about. And that is incredibly exciting.
Seth Rogovoy rogovoy@berkshire.net music news, interviews, reviews, et al.
Next Article || Previous Article || Back |