
|
John Medeski flies solo (Sept. 15, 2000)
(GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass., Sept. 17, 2000) – Pianist/composer John Medeski
offered listeners a glimpse into his private, creative process on Friday
night at the Kellogg Art Center on the campus of Simon’s Rock College.
In two, hour-long improvisations, Medeski explored the wide range of his
instrument and his musical intelligence, alternating what appeared to be
in-the-moment improvisations with snatches of riffs and melodies, both
original and borrowed.
His aggressive, freewheeling approach to the solo piano format, with its
forearm and flat-handed smashes and hyperspeed blasts of chords, had its
vague antecedents in similar efforts by piano legends Thelonious Monk and
Cecil Taylor. There couldn’t be two better role models for a young, pop-jazz
pianist like Medeski – who is best known for his work with the groove-jazz
trio, Medeski, Martin and Wood – and if that’s the direction he wants to
head in, more power to him.
For his first number, Medeski took the stage and grabbed the audience’s
attention with the smash of his forearm against the keys. He answered an
explosive, violent bass figure with a delicate high-end melody, thus
establishing a basic unit of the improviser’s grammar that he would
repeatedly return to throughout the evening.
He then found a single bass note which particularly pleased him, and he
turned the single note into a kind of ostinato atop which he sprinkled
linear melody and blurry blasts of block chords.
Over the course of his improvisation, Medeski varied all the musical
elements, including rhythm, dynamics, mood and tone, but he occasionally
returned to the original bass figure and the soprano response.
His improvisation was also a stylistic journey, which visited the roadhouse
with a bluesy bit of Gershwin’s “Summertime,” went to Chicago for some
boogie-woogie, traveled to New York for some jazzy Broadway music, and back
to Chicago for some Ramsey Lewis-like, ‘60s soul-jazz, the precursor to his
trio’s music.
Sometimes he would make these stylistic leaps from bar to bar, in the
prevailing fashion of the contemporary avant-garde, where such frenzied
genre-hopping and –blending is as much the point as anything. But all the
music was also slightly off, filtered through a scrim of atonality or decay,
lending it a personal stamp of authenticity.
In an earlier interview, Medeski told the Eagle that he views the piano as
an orchestra, and he highlighted the instrument’s versatile qualities with a
passage in which he established waves of sound from the high keys. He stood
up and played fast, repetitive passages, milking their resonant, painterly
quality to create a wash of circular, chime-like sounds. A few blue notes
and a quick passage in an Asian mode and he brought the piece to a close.
Not more than half a minute later he broke into a quick, furious
boogie-woogie tune in which his right and left hand did battle with each
other, fighting over the rights to claim the song’s key. His feet got into
the act, too, and his bandmate Billy Martin might want to have a talk with
his piano-playing partner, who evidently aspires to the drum seat, too.
After a brief intermission, Medeski – who said hardly a word during the
two-hour recital – came back out, this time playing a sirenlike tune on the
melodica or similar breath-powered, hand-held keyboard. He put the
instrument inside the piano to take advantage of the grand piano’s resonant
qualities, and then duetted with himself on the two separate instruments
simultaneously.
He then established the mode of his second extended improvisation, which
like much of his work with his trio was based to large extent on a simple
gospel figure, which he would take apart, explore and recombine in various
ways over the next hour.
Splashes of chords punctuated blurry runs of melody that were as much about
physics as about music. Then he got rid of the melody and just played the
block chords, punctuating the silence which contained the suggestion of his
melody.
Bits of Monk and standards like “That Ol’ Devil Moon,” an interlude of
tango, and a bluesy figure that sounded like Chopin by way of Ray Charles,
found their way into his second improvisation, which wasn’t as evocative as
the first one.
Maybe it was that his first piece by definition came across as a fresh
surprise, and after an hour of viewing the composer/improviser at work, the
charm or novelty had already worn off. In any case, by the end of his second
piece, the recital hall was noticeably emptier than it was at the evening’s
outset, and the energy level had flagged.
[This review originally appeared in the Berkshire Eagle on Sept. 18, 2000.
Copyright Seth Rogovoy 2000. All rights reserved.]
Seth Rogovoy rogovoy@berkshire.net music news, interviews, reviews, et al.
Next Article || Previous Article || Back
|